Making Performance Measurement Relevant? Administrators’ Attitudes and Structural Orientations
Author: KAIFENG YANG
Published in PAQ, Vol. 31 No. 3
To make performance measurement (PEM) more relevant, researchers have proposed such solutions as citizen-driven PEM, linking PEM with political accountability, using PEM to facilitate double-loop policy learning, and measuring fairness. But will public administrators be receptive to the ideas? How do organizational contexts affect their attitudes? Based on survey data, this study finds a majority of the respondents are positive about citizen-driven PEM and measuring fairness, but skeptical about using PEM results for external accountability or double-loop policy learning. The impacts of procedural orientation, market orientation, and network orientation are examined.
Subscribers: Login to read this article
Guests: Subscribe to PAQ, or purchase individual article access for $10.
The article is not available for automatic download. We will email the article to you as a PDF file upon receiving your payment, typically within 24 hours.