Gauging Social Justice: A Survey of Indices for Public Management
SHU WANG and SHARON MASTRACCI
PAQ, Vol. 38 No. 4, (2014)
Social policy development is a fundamental topic in public management, and social policies commonly seek to restore or establish equity among groups of citizens within a plural state. One casualty of the rise of New Public Management has been the importance of social equity, which has assumed subordinate status compared to efficiency and effectiveness. New Public Management has also reified that which can be captured quantitatively, and social equity resists measurement. Equity measures can guide policy makers’ efforts in agenda setting to identify areas of greater need, which is particularly important given scarce financial resources. We use the definition of equity put forth by Rawls and applied by Frederickson, and focus on equitable distribution of public goods and services. We then examine strengths and weaknesses of five equity measures. Consistent with the best contributions to public management, these five measures were developed in related disciplines and imported to public management. What is more, although these measures presuppose the use of large data sets, they have been employed to great effect in internationally- comparative research, for many of them allow researchers to use aggregated data such as country-level data, which is at times the only level of detail available. Finally, the measures we review need not rely on race and ethnicity as proxies for equity, which may be more appropriate in countries where economic disparities do not neatly coincide with demographic characteristics.
Subscribers: Login to read this article
Guests: Subscribe to PAQ, or purchase individual article access for $10.
The article is not available for automatic download. We will email the article to you as a PDF file upon receiving your payment, typically within 24 hours.